<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon Monarch ATB 8&#215;42</title>
	<atom:link href="http://productreviewdb.com/20090810/nikon-monarch-atb-8x42/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://productreviewdb.com/20090810/nikon-monarch-atb-8x42/</link>
	<description>Product Review Database - Product Reviews and Ratings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:55:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: L Hudson</title>
		<link>http://productreviewdb.com/20090810/nikon-monarch-atb-8x42/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>L Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productreviewdb.com/?p=26#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Bought these bins recently, they really are excellent, very easy to use, good feel, amazing light gathering and reproduction, and only 1 and 1/2 pounds. If you read Cornell Lab of Ornithology review, there is only 1 set of binoculars under 1000 dollars that beat these,(and they are 6x lenses not really suitable for general birding.)Everything about them feels and works like 1000 dollar lenses with two exceptions, the lens cap and raingaurd, the former in particular would be a disgrace on 50 dollar lenses, i am going to see if i can buy generic replacements. Lots of other web reviews also rave about them, and 98% of people would not tell the difference between these and top range Zeiss, Leica etc. And for 300 dollars you can take them anywhere and enjoy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought these bins recently, they really are excellent, very easy to use, good feel, amazing light gathering and reproduction, and only 1 and 1/2 pounds. If you read Cornell Lab of Ornithology review, there is only 1 set of binoculars under 1000 dollars that beat these,(and they are 6x lenses not really suitable for general birding.)Everything about them feels and works like 1000 dollar lenses with two exceptions, the lens cap and raingaurd, the former in particular would be a disgrace on 50 dollar lenses, i am going to see if i can buy generic replacements. Lots of other web reviews also rave about them, and 98% of people would not tell the difference between these and top range Zeiss, Leica etc. And for 300 dollars you can take them anywhere and enjoy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eagle</title>
		<link>http://productreviewdb.com/20090810/nikon-monarch-atb-8x42/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Eagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productreviewdb.com/?p=26#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I did alot of research before deciding on this pair. As an experienced photographer, optical quality was my top priority.
I originally purchased them for hiking and long range mountain scanning in southern Oregon, and while initially perplexed between the 10X or 8X version; I found the extra sharpness of the 8X resolution negated the need for a 10X magnification, because they rendered so much detail.

With the 8X, I spotted a fire lookout station that I&#039;d never seen before, on a mountain 15 miles out of town. Quite remarkable. Added to that, was the research at Cornell University&#039;s Ornithology Center on the web. Birdwatchers extraordinaire; who called them a steal. I concur. I never thought I&#039;d be so happy paying this price for binoculars, but it was a no brainer. Tack sharp, lightweight and well worth owning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did alot of research before deciding on this pair. As an experienced photographer, optical quality was my top priority.<br />
I originally purchased them for hiking and long range mountain scanning in southern Oregon, and while initially perplexed between the 10X or 8X version; I found the extra sharpness of the 8X resolution negated the need for a 10X magnification, because they rendered so much detail.</p>
<p>With the 8X, I spotted a fire lookout station that I&#8217;d never seen before, on a mountain 15 miles out of town. Quite remarkable. Added to that, was the research at Cornell University&#8217;s Ornithology Center on the web. Birdwatchers extraordinaire; who called them a steal. I concur. I never thought I&#8217;d be so happy paying this price for binoculars, but it was a no brainer. Tack sharp, lightweight and well worth owning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
